Author's details

Name: Marcia Crawford
Date registered: July 11, 2011

Latest posts

  1. Decision Fatigue — April 16, 2018
  2. Shishito Peppers — March 22, 2018
  3. Nutrition “news” — March 15, 2018
  4. Glycemic Index – tool or toy? — February 26, 2018
  5. 19 Cup Holders — February 20, 2018

Most commented posts

  1. Portion Plate — 5 comments
  2. D Buzz — 4 comments
  3. Q for you — 4 comments
  4. Food: Friend or Foe — 3 comments
  5. Cheers — 3 comments

Author's posts listings

Nutrition “news”

Haven’t done this in awhile, but here we go today: POP QUIZ.

Should you get your nutrition advice from:

  1. a Russian “bot”
  2. your neighbor (but honestly, would Janis steer me wrong?)
  3. the magazines at the grocery store check-out line
  4. someone selling you something
  5. Facebook
  6. none of the above

Did Facebook stump you? Food and nutrition information on Facebook is consistently specious;  and we often buy right in. We take the grain of truth we recognize from an article and figure the rest of what they’re promoting must be correct. Oops.

So, let’s review. What we want to see on Facebook are pictures of kids, grands, cat videos, a great sunset.

What we should avoid is health information (probably on any health subject but definitely related to nutrition).

You can skip reading: bananas cause weight gain, coconut water is a superior fluid replacement drink, juice cleanses are the way to go (pun intended) or keto diets for weight loss are IT  (since no scientific studies support that). Well, I could go on, but you get the picture.

While promoters of these fallacies are getting smarter and “publish” articles that look more scientific, they aren’t any better than the old grocery tabloid…though, sometimes I do wonder about the Elvis sightings.

Answer #6 to be well,


Permanent link to this article:

Glycemic Index – tool or toy?

The glycemic index has fascinated the medical community for almost 40 years and after all this time, I’m not certain we are of one mind about how to use it or even its value.

Two U of Toronto physicians, in an attempt to better treat their patients with Type 1 diabetes, came up with the idea of studying individual food’s influence on blood sugar.

Prior to their work, we thought simple carbohydrates raise blood sugar quickly and predictably. And, we assumed all complex carbohydrates acted alike and raised blood sugar more slowly. We stuck with that theory until specific foods were tested.

Diabetic or not, none of us wants a rapid rise in blood sugar.

Briefly, the glycemic index (GI) scale (0-100) is a reflection of the body’s response to one specific food as measured against the body’s response to glucose.

Today, one sees lists of high-, moderate- and low-glycemic index foods. Theoretically, these lists should be helpful for you when selecting carbohydrate-containing food. Pretzels are in the “high” category which means it will raise your blood sugar faster than ice cream (moderate category) – surprising and probably not all that helpful.

But it gets more confusing. Many variables alter a food’s glycemic index: ripeness, food preparation method, cooking time. Pasta for example cooked al dente has a lower value than pasta cooked longer.

Fat eaten along with a carb-containing food lowers the index. Ditto fiber, ditto acid (vinegar or lemon juice).  Variety of the fruit or vegetable?  Sure, GI changes with produce variety too.

So, while some professionals put great faith in GI lists and now “glycemic load”, I think it makes choosing foods more complicated than necessary. Let’s go back to the basics – limit your processed or “manufactured” food.

And don’t eat so much to be well,





Permanent link to this article:

Older posts «

» Newer posts